An Examination of Customer Loyalty in Indonesian Banking Industry: Application of the Investment Model Keni1, Hasnah Haron2 and Ishak Ismail3 1 Tarumanagara University (Economics Faculty), Kampus II, Jakarta 11470 2Universiti Sains Malaysia (Graduate School of Business), 11800 Minden, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia 3Universiti Sains Malaysia (School of Management), 11800 Minden, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia _____________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to provide a conceptual framework for the study of the
relationship between service satisfaction, quality of
alternative,
investment size and customer loyalty
in Indonesian banking industry.
Previous studies have looked at factors influencing customer loyalty, but only a few of these studies
applied an
investment model to
predict
customer loyalty. The
present
study
intends
to fill this gap in the literature by applying the investment model that is originally developed in the psychology literature. The
advantage of this
model
is that this model does not only examine the customer’s internal but also investigate customer’s external motives for loyalty.
In this conceptual paper, a framework is presented on how to study
the relationship between investment model and customer loyalty
in banking industry in Indonesia. This framework can be used by researchers and practitioners to study and model empirical research into this area in the future.. Keywords: Customer Loyalty, Indonesian Banking Indutry, Investment Model _______________________________________________________________________________________ 1. INTRODUCTION
Banking industry is one of the significant
contributor
towards economic development of a country. As a
results
of business dynamism and globalization of banking industry, competition among banks
become
stiff. In order to be sustainable, many banks have undergone mergers and alliances within banks in
the
country or abroad. Indonesia
as one of the Asian developing countries, definitely need a strong banking industry as a foundation to create strong economic base. Banking industry contribution to GDP is relatively stable over the last five years, about 2.30 percent (Bank Indonesia, 2012).
Banking industry, as financial intermediary institution,
plays an important
role in
economy growth. In year 2011, the
total amount of
loan
given to third party was about Rp 2,
200
trillion,equivalent to approximately
30
percent of GDP (Rp
7,427
trillion) (Bank Indonesia,
2012).
Indonesian banking industry has
been consolidated
since the Asian Crisis in year 1998. It is reflected by the decreasing number of total banks in Indonesia, from 222 banks in 1997 (Bank Indonesia, 2002) to 120 banks in December 2012 (Bank Indonesia, 2012). A series of
merger, acquisition
and closing down during the Asian
crisis
has resulted in the decreasing number of banks in Indonesia. The shrinking number of banks has triggered the competition between the surviving banks. Table
1
shows the list of mergers and acquisitions between 2000 and 2010.
Table 1 The List of Mergers and Acquisitions between Year 2000 and Year
2010 Bank Category Merging
Bank
Year Name of New Bank Large Banks PT Bank Niaga PT Bank
Lippo 2008
PT Bank
CIMB Niaga Tbk
Bank Dai-Ichi Kanggo Bank
IBJ
Indonesia
2000 PT
Bank
Mizuho
Indonesia Bank Bali Bank Artha Media Bank
Universal
Bank
Prima Express
Bank Patriot
2001
PT Bank
Permata Tbk Medium sized banks
PT Bank Sumitomo Mitsuo Indonesia Sakura Swadarma Bank 2001 PT Bank Sumitomo Mitsuo Indonesia UFJ Indonesia Bank
Tokai Lippo
bank
2001 UFJ Indonesia
Bank UFJ Indonesia PT Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi 2006 PT Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd Bank Hagakita Bank Haga Bank Rabobank Duta 2008 PT Bank Rabobank International Indonesia Bank Bank Buana Bank UOB Indonesia 2010 PT Bank UOB Buana Tbk Bank
Pikko
Bank
CIC
Bank Danpac 2001 2001 2004 PT Bank Mutiara Tbk Bank Artha Graha Bank Inter-pacific Tbk 2005 PT Bank Artha Graha International Tbk Commonwealth Indonesia Artha Niaga Kencana 2007 PT Bank Commonwealth
Small banks
Bank Multicor Bank Windu Kentjana 2007 PT Bank Windu Kentjana International Tbk Bank Harmoni International Bank Index Selindo 2008 PT Bank Index Selindo Bank Haga Bank Hagakita 2008 Rabobank Duta Bank Bank OCBC Bank NISP 2009 PT Bank OCBC-NISP Tbk
Source: Banks’ Annual Report of Each Bank (2011) The
opening up of the banking system to foreign investors in 1998 has also created a higher level of competition in the Indonesian banking industry. To
recapitalize
the banking sector, foreign banks are allowed to become a majority shareholder (up to 99 percent) of Indonesian local banks (PP No. 29/1999). This has resulted in many foreign banks acquiring local banks, and the acquisition varies from small to large banks. Since the Asian crisis in 1998, the
Indonesia
economy has transformed into a strong and sustainable economic growth country with a reasonable profit margin in the banking sector compared to others regionally. Moreover, Indonesia is the fourth most populated country and backed-up by a growing middle class with
a
strong purchasing power. With the economic outlook, Indonesian banking industry is considered to be a prospective investment. Post-acquisition, the foreign-owned banks have advantages to greater access to capital, foreign exchange fund and network. During the expansionary, the foreign-owned banks with the backup of their parent company (mostly world top foreign bank) have a higher power to generate capital. Meanwhile, it was further supported by the multinational companies from their country
of origin.
Table
2 shows
the list of foreign-owned banks in Indonesia.
Table 2
The
List
of
Indonesia Foreign – Owned Banks Acquired Bank Owner Share (%) Bank Central Asia Farallon capital-led consortium - Mauritius 49.15
Bank CIMB Niaga CIMB Group
Sdn
Bhd - Malaysia 77.
24 Bank Danamon Asia Financial (Temasek) – Singapore 67.63 Bank Ekonomi Rahardja HSBC Asia Pacific Holdings Limited – UK 98.96 Bank Hana Hana Bank – Korea International Finance Corporation 72.10 19.90 Bank Internasional Indonesia
Sorak Financial Holdings Pte Ltd Maybank Offshore Corporate Services Sdn Bhd
– Malaysia 54.33 43.19 Bank Nusantara Parahyangan
ACOM Co Ltd The bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ
Ltd 55.68 20.00 Pan Indonesia Bank Votraint No 1103 PTY Limited 38.82 Bank Permata Standard Chartered - UK 44.51 Bank Swadesi Bank of India - India 76.00
Bank UOB Buana UOB International Investment Private Limited
98.97 Source: Prasetyantoko (2011) The
launching of ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) in year 2015 is predicted to increase further the competition
among the
banks.
AEC aims
to create a (i) single market and production base, (ii) highly competitive economic region, (iii) region of equitable economic development, and (iv) region fully integrated into the global economy. It will be initiated by free flow of goods, services, investment, capital and labors.
Therefore,
the
integration
of ASEAN financial and capital markets will be implemented in 2015 through financial services liberalization, capital account liberalization and capital market development (MITI, 2008). Financial services liberalization may allow ASEAN members’
bank
to operate in all lines of banking operations. Limited asset and capital of Indonesian banks
limits
their competition with international banks operating in Indonesia. On the other hand, regional banks with
great
reputation might have lower entry
barrier
to penetrate ASEAN countries, such as DBS and Maybank. One of the ways for Indonesian banks to be sustainable in
the
business is
through
creating and retaining loyal customers. However, creating and retaining customers needs time, money and great effort. Banks may create products with great
feature
but their competitors could replicate it easily. Therefore, bank has to build a
strong
relationship with customers in order to make them satisfied and loyal. There are many complaints about bank services and
dispute
between bank and its
customer.
For example: data shows that customer complaints received Bank Indonesia has increased significantly to 510 complaints in 2011 compared to only 278 complaints in 2010 (83.4% increase in a year) (Yoga, 2011, as cited by Syafrizal, Nabsiah & Ismail, 2012). Consistent with the
report issued
by Bank Indonesia, Yayasan Lembaga Konsumen Indonesia (YLKI), Indonesian Consumers Organization also receive 620 complaints in 2012. According to Sudaryatmo, the chairman of Indonesian Consumers Organization, the highest level of customer complaints is from banking services (18.46%) (Wiyanto, 2013). To prevent customers’ switching, it is important to
know how to
maintain customer loyalty.
Creating
and
maintaining
customer loyalty has
become
a strategic
mandate
in today’s service market (Ganesh, Arnold, & Reynolds, 2000). Customer loyalty is an
essential factor
in business
survival
and
development
(Chen, 2012). An important element to lead to the company’s
is the
company's
ability
to retain customers and keep customers loyal (Dekimpe, Steenkamp, Mellens, & Abeele, 1997). Loyal customers will
build
the company's business by
buying
more; paying a premium price and
providing
new referrals through
recommend new
customers
positive
word of mouth from time to time (Ganesh et al., 2000). This is consistent with the results of Reichheld and Sasser (Reichheld, 1993; Reichheld & Sasser, 1990) which shows a significant contribution from a loyal customer to the financial performance of a business. They found that between 25% and 95% of the increase in the net present value of profits derived from increased customer retention by 5% in 14 industries.
The importance
of loyalty in marketing
practice
is based on the fact that it is
much cheaper
to retain
existing
customers
rather than finding
new customers (Bellizzi & Bristol, 2004; Boora & Singh, 2011; Rust & Zahorik, 1993).
In relation to that, some surveys show that it is six times more expensive to acquire a new customer than to retain existing customer
(Rosenberg & Czepiel, 1983). Customer loyalty allows companies to reduce operating
costs
and marketing cost,
such as to obtain
a new customer (Griffin, 1995, 2002).Customer loyalty is beneficial not only in the short
term
(O’Brien & Jones, 1995) but also in long-
term
as it will lead to
spread
positive word of mouth (Reichheld & Teal, 1996 in Ganesh et al., 2000). Oliver (1997) suggested that loyal customers directly influence profitability through a guaranteed steady flow of customers.
According to Murray (1991), financial service is very real and heterogeneous, and the perceived risk is often greater so there is a tendency to give a stronger emphasis on customer loyalty as a strategy to reduce risk.
Related to that, in the context of banking, it has been found that the increase in customer retention can substantially affect profits.
An
increase in bank customer retention
by 5%
can increase
profits by 85% (Veloutsou, Daskou, & Daskou, 2004). There have been a few studies investigating
factors influencing customer loyalty but
this article focuses
only
on
investment model to predict customer loyalty.
One
of the
most common model
that
is widely used is service quality model. However, this generic model only looked at customer’s internal motives for loyalty.
Recently the Investment model, initially introduced in the psychology literature, has been
used
in marketing to examine customer loyalty in restaurants.
Investment model is not only looking at
customer’s internal
motives
but also customer’s external motives for loyalty.
Therefore, this study would like to extend the investment model to the banking industry.
Firstly, investment model is developed to predict
commitment and persistence across many types of relationship (Le & Agnew, 2003; Rusbult, 1980a, 1980b).
Although the
investment model was
originally proposed
to
examine
interpersonal relationships,
its application
can be
extended
to
explain firm-person relationships (Le & Agnew, 2003).
According to the investment model, commitment to maintain relationships should be determined by three factors:
(i)
satisfaction with the relationship or
to
the degree
that
a relationship is satisfying, commitment should be stronger;
(ii)
a comparison of
perceive
best availability of alternative to the relationship (quality of relationship).
It means
that
persons should feel more committed to the extent that
they have only poor
alternatives
to their current involvements;
(iii)
individual’s investment in their relationship (investment size), commitment should be greater to the degree that the
individual has
invested numerous resources in the relationship either intrinsically or extrinsically (Rusbult, 1980a; Rusbult,
Johnson, & Morrow,
1986; Rusbult,
Martz, & Agnew,
1998). Further study
of
the Investment Model suggests that, it not only influence the interpersonal relationship, but also
others relationship
such as: employees and employers relationship, individual’s commitment to their hobbies, brand’
s
commitment and so on (Farrell & Rusbult, 1981; Gable & Hunting, 2001; Geyer,
Dotson, & King,
1991; Koslowsky & Kluger, 1986; Ping, 2007; Rusbult & Farrell, 1983; Sung & Choi, 2010). Studies among students have shown that
the
investment model can also be
used
to
demonstrate
students’ commitment to their courses (Hatcher,
Kryter, Prus, & Fitzgerald,
1992). Through these three decades, Investment Model has been empirically supported by a
large number
of similar studies.
This
article is
to
examine
the
factor
that
influence
customer loyalty in Indonesian banking industry. It is expected to increase the Indonesian
banking
competitiveness and to reduce customer dissatisfaction, so the customer
will not invest their money in other countries. 2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Customer Loyalty Customer loyalty is
thought to be
an
important
concept for marketing practitioners. Loyalty initially is rooted during feudal
times
when allegiance to the sovereign was fundamental to the success,
perhaps even the
survival (Hill & Alexander, 2000). Customer loyalty is a deeply held commitment to
rebuy
or
re-patronize
a
preferred
product or service
consistently
in the future, despite situational influences and marketing efforts
having
the potential to cause switching behavior (Oliver, 1997, 1999). Thus, loyalty includes readiness to act (repurchase) and resistance over existing alternatives.
M. D.
Johnson and Gustafsson (2000) explain the definition of customer loyalty by differentiating between customer loyalty and retention. Loyalty is a customer’
s
intention or predisposition to
buy, while
retention is the behavior itself.
An
increase of 5% in customer loyalty can double a firm’s profitability
and the economic benefits of high customer loyalty are considerable
and, in many industries, explain the differences in profitability among competitors (Reichheld, 1993; Reichheld & Sasser, 1990). They found that 80% of the profits generated by 20% of the
company's
customers - some companies
actually be argued
that
20% of customers generate
120% of
the
profits. Customer loyalty is achieved by providing the highest quality services and ensures that customers are fully satisfied. Hence, they recognize that customer loyalty
is
earned by
consistently delivering
superior value. According to Griffin (2002), the concept of customer loyalty
is geared
more
to
behavior than
to
attitude. When a customer is loyal, he or she
exhibits
purchase behavior defined as
nonrandom
purchase expressed over time by
some
decision-
making unit.
Further, she explains that a loyal customer is one who:
makes
regular purchases, purchases
across product
and services lines, refers others and
demonstrate
immunity to the pull of the competition (Griffin, 2002). A customer repurchases the same brand, not
whether
they actually like the brand more than other
brands,
is often referred as brand loyalty (Neal, Quester, & Hawkins, 1999; Sheth & Mittal, 2004). From the above description it can be seen that loyalty not only
involves
making a purchase or even repeat purchases, but also
represents
a positive level of commitment by the customer to the supplier it is the degree of positive commitment which distinguishes truly loyal customers (Hill & Alexander, 2000).
The objectives of
loyalty
strategies are
to increase
customer loyalty, increase
the
purchase
amount
of
loyal customers, decrease customer
loyalty to
competitors, and decrease customer switching
(Jacoby, Chestnut, & Fisher, 1978). Therefore, it is important to investigate factors that
influencing
customer loyalty to understand how customer loyalty can be improved and customers can be retained.
Customer loyalty is comprised of many dimensions and its conceptualization
has been defined and measured in different ways (Uncles, Dowling, & Hammond, 2003). There is no consensus among researchers concerning the operationalization of loyalty. Operationalization of loyalty can be categorized by behavioral approach, attitudinal approach, behavioral and attitudinal approach (two-dimensional or composite approach).
Comprising many dimensions and customer loyalty conceptualization has been dominated by the behavioral and attitudinal approaches
(Lewis & Soureli, 2006).
More
recently, three-
dimensional
conceptualizations have been proposed where loyalty includes behavioral, attitudinal and cognitive approach (T. Jones & Taylor, 2007). A large part of loyalty may involve behavioral and attitudinal approach. Several authors suggested that
the conceptualization of
loyalty
as the relationship
between the relative
attitude toward
an entity (brand/service/store/
vendor)
and patronage
behavior
(Dick & Basu, 1994; Morgan & Hunt, 1994; Oliver, 1999) This is consistent with Ganesh et al. (2000) that customer loyalty
as
a
combination
of both commitment to the relationship and other overt loyalty behavior. Loyalty is
often
gauged by behavioral measures such as frequency of purchase or word of mouth, because behavior
reflects
what customers actually do (Dekimpe et al., 1997). Behavioral measures such as repeat purchase have been criticized for
a
lack of conceptual basis, and for failing to yield a comprehensive insight into the underlying reasons for loyalty (Day, 1969). The attitudinal approach, in contrast,
see
a loyal customer
as
attached to a brand, and when their positive beliefs are
reinforced,
these customers are
said
to
buy
a brand more often (Riley et al., 1997). Behavioral patterns
are thus
one of the components loyalty, however if a customer does not
also demonstrate
a favorable attitude towards a brand or company, there is
a possibility
of brand switching (Bloemer & Kasper, 1995).
With regard
to behavioral loyalty in service
setting,
Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry (1994) proposed comprehensive
behavioral loyalty
taxonomy. This taxonomy initially
comprised the following
four main categories: (i) word-of-mouth communication, (ii) repurchase intention, (iii) price sensitivity, and (iv) complaining behavior (Parasuraman et al., 1994). However, based on factor analysis, using 13-item scale, they identified the following five behavioral intention dimensions: loyalty to company, propensity to switch to another service provider, willingness to pay more, external
response
to problem, and internal
response
to problem. According to Assael (2001), there are three limitations of behavioral approach measures of loyalty: (i)
measurement of
loyalty based on past behavior may be misleading; (ii) consumer purchases
may
not reflect reinforcement; (iii) brand loyalty is not merely a function of past behavior. Further, he states that loyalty is a
multidimensional
concept that must incorporate the consumer’
s
commitment to the brand. Therefore, he suggests that there
is the need
a cognitive as well as a behavioral view. Customer loyalty can be viewed as
developing in
three
phases
(Oliver, 1997): (i) cognitive loyalty, the information base available to the consumer compellingly points to one brand over another (loyalty based on cognition only); (ii) affective loyalty, loyalty is based on
affect.
Attitude is
shown as
a function of cognition (expectations) in the early purchase periods and
as
a function of cognition (expectancy disconfirmation); (iii) conative loyalty (behavioral intention),
as
influenced by changes in
affect
toward the brand.
Conation
implies an intention or commitment to behave toward a goal in a
particular
manner.
The
Investment Model The investment model is initially developed in psychology literature to
predict
commitment and persistence in a wide range of settings – in dating relationships (Rusbult, 1980a, 1983; Rusbult et al., 1986) in friendships (Rusbult, 1980b) and also on the job (Farrell & Rusbult, 1981; Rusbult & Farrell, 1983). The Investment model is based on
several
principles of interdependence theory and assumes that individuals
are
in general motivated to maximize rewards
while
minimizing cost (Kelley & Thibaut, 1978 in Rusbult (1980a). Interdependence theory identifies two main processes through which
dependent grow
(Rusbult et al., 1998). First,
individual
become increasingly dependent to the extent that they experience high satisfaction
in
a relationship. Satisfaction level refers to the positive versus negative
affect
experienced in a relationship. Satisfaction is influenced by the extent to which a partner fulfills the individual’s most important needs. Second, dependence is not only affected by satisfaction, but also affected by the quality of available alternatives. Quality of alternatives refers to the perceived desirability of the best available to a relationship. It is based on the extent to which the individual’s most important needs could effectively be fulfilled
outside
of the current relationship. The investment model further extends interdependency theory and states that commitment is affected not
just
by the outcome values of the current relationship and alternatives, but also investment size (Rusbult, 1980a; Rusbult et al., 1998). In conclusion, according to the investment model, commitment to maintain relationships should be determined by three factors. First, satisfaction with the relationship or
to
the degree
that
a relationship is satisfying, commitment should be stronger. Second, a comparison of
perceive
best availability of alternative to the relationship (quality of relationship).
It means
that
persons should feel more committed to the extent that
they have only poor
alternatives
to their current involvements. Third, individual’s investment in their relationship (investment size), commitment should be greater to the degree that the
individual has
invested numerous resources in the relationship either intrinsically or extrinsically (Rusbult, 1980a; Rusbult et al., 1986; Rusbult et al., 1998). Further study
of
the Investment Model suggests that, it not only influence the interpersonal relationship, but also
others relationship
such as: employees and employers relationship, individual’s commitment to their hobbies, brand’
s
commitment and so on (Farrell & Rusbult, 1981; Gable & Hunting, 2001; Geyer et al., 1991; Koslowsky & Kluger, 1986; Ping, 2007; Rusbult & Farrell, 1983; Sung & Choi, 2010). Studies among
student
have shown that
the
investment model can also be
used
to
demonstrate student
commitment to their courses (Hatcher et al., 1992). Through these three decades, Investment Model has been empirically supported by a
large number
of similar studies. A recent meta-analysis (Le & Agnew, 2003)
involving
52 studies and almost 12,000 subjects confirmed the value of the investment model. This meta-analysis showed that
relationship
satisfaction, the quality of alternatives and investment in the relationship all
correlated
significantly with
commitment.
The next section will explain each variable of the investment model. Satisfaction Satisfaction will occur when the degree of rewards
relative
to costs obtained in relationship exceed
his
expectations. Satisfaction refers to the degree of positive
affect
associated with
a
relationship (Rusbult, 1980a; Rusbult & Buunk, 1993; Rusbult et al., 1998). In line with marketing literature, satisfaction is a judgment that a product or service feature, or the product or service itself,
provides
a
pleasurable
level of consumption-related fulfillment (Oliver, 1997). It means that customers
who
feel satisfied
if
they meet the needs, desires, goals, etc. as compared with
the standard pleasant than unpleasant. Satisfaction is a person’s
feelings of pleasure or disappointment
resulting
from comparing a product’s perceived performance (or outcome) in relation to
his or her
expectation. If the performance falls
short of
expectations, the customer
is
dissatisfied. If the performance matches the expectations, the customer
is
satisfied. If the performance exceeds expectations, the customer
is
highly satisfied
or delighted
(Kotler & Keller, 2006). The most commonly used conceptualization is based on two approaches: cumulative and transaction (Boulding, 1993).
As a
cumulative approach, customer satisfaction can be defined as overall evaluation based on the total purchase and consumption experience with a good or service over time, whereas transaction approach defines customer satisfaction
is expressed
as a function of pre purchase expectations and post purchase perceived performance of the
respective
product/service.
Quality of Alternatives The quality of alternatives refers to an individual’s judgment
of
the attractiveness of available alternatives – another relationship, dating around or the option of non-involvement (Rusbult & Buunk, 1993).
While,
Impett et al. (2001) define alternatives as an individual’s subjective assessment
of
the rewards and costs that could be obtained
outside
the current relationship,
including
specific other partners, spending time with friends and family or spending time alone (Impett et al., 2001; Rusbult et al., 1998).
That is,
an individual’s choice of either staying put or terminating the relationship is influenced by the availability of quality or attractive alternatives (Boakye, Kwon, Blankson, & Prybutok, 2012). Applied to
consumer
-brand relationships, the quality of alternatives refers to a consumer’s judgment or evaluation
of
the attractiveness of available alternative brand choices or
option,
for example: number of competing brands or quality of competing brands (Sung & Choi, 2010). Investment Size Investment size refers to the magnitude and importance of the resources
that are
attached to a relationship and would lose
if
the relationship
were to end
(Impett et al., 2001; Rusbult et al., 1998). Investments can be divided into two types:
1)
extrinsic investment occurs when initially extraneous resources become inextricably connected to the relationship (e.g., mutual friends, shared memories or material possessions, activities/persons/objects/events uniquely associated with the relationship);
2)
intrinsic investments are
those
resources that are
put
directly into the relationship, such as time, emotional effort, or self-disclosures (Rusbult, 1980a, 1983). Invested resources may also prove to be rewarding or costly, for example, shared memories or mutual friends
could
also serve as rewards, whereas emotional effort or monetary investments
could
be costly (Rusbult & Farrell, 1983).
In
an interpersonal relationship, investment
include
direct resources such as time, effort, and money that an individual has devoted to the relationship, as well as indirect resources that become linked to the relationship,
including
shared memories, mutual friends, and objects uniquely associated with the relationship (Rusbult & Buunk, 1993). In marketing literature, investment is
closely
related to the
concept
of switching costs and termination cost (Boakye et al., 2012; Bügel, Buunk, & Verhoef, 2010; Sung & Choi, 2010),
with refers
to the technical, financial or psychological factors
which
make it difficult or expensive for a customer to change brand (Beerli et al., 2004). Investment in customer-company relationship will raise the switching costs and hence make it more difficult for customers to change producers.
In brief,
making investments in customer relationships
is of
the
utmost
importance in terms of customer commitment (Bügel et al., 2010). Investment in relationships is not a clear concept in marketing literature. There are two perspectives
to explain
about investment in relationship. First, according to Hart & Johnson (1999) in Sung and Choi (2010) the perspective that
consumers
exhibit loyalty to a company and stay in the relationship with the company
if
the company has invested a great deal in the relationship with them. Second,
in
the other way round,
investment in relationship
is
customers’ own
investment in the relationship
with a brand or a company (Sung & Choi, 2010). Human relationship literature suggests that an individual’s personal investment in a relationship should
be an important
predictor of relationship commitment. This
article examines
investment from the customer’s perspective that
customer
can invest time, money and effort in relationships with their banks.
Previous studies show
that only few marketing literature has been
done into
the applicability of the investment model in examining factors that
influencing
customer loyalty;
a lot of research has been into the role of individual variables from the investment model. According to
Bügel et al. (2010) the Investment Model
is believed that
relative
impacts to be exist
in the service industry.
On
their study, they have examined the applicability of the psychological investment model to customer-company commitment.
One of the limitations stated from the authors that they only examined self-reported customer commitment, not actual customer loyalty (Bügel et al., 2010). More recently,
Boakye et al. (2012)
examine
the applicability of the investment model to attitudinal loyalty in casual dining restaurant.
On
their study, they did not consider behavioral loyalty to examine factors that influencing customer loyalty.
3.
Theoretical Framework Based on the literature review
concerning
the
study variable on
investment model and customer loyalty, the
framework of this study is as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Proposed conceptual framework From the conceptual framework, the research hypotheses for this study are as follows: Many studies show that satisfaction has a positive and significant impact on loyalty (Beerli et al., 2004; J. Bloemer et al., 1998; Ganguli & Roy, 2011; Lewis & Soureli, 2006; Mouthinho & Smith, 2000; Nguyen & LeBlanc, 1998).
Satisfaction is considered to act as an antecedent of loyalty,
arising
out of direct prior experience (Dick & Basu, 1994). Customers who are satisfied with their bank probably develop a positive attitude towards the bank.
As a
result, their intention to stay with the bank in the future
is likely to
be
high. Customer satisfaction is the main antecedent and also has a significant effect for both
affective and conative loyalty
(Methlie & Nysveen, 1999).
Higher levels of loyalty behaviors were recorded when customers were very satisfied with the way in which a service failure was addressed. When the customer is very satisfied,
and then
intended loyalty behaviors would
appear to
be enhanced.
The study demonstrates
a relationship between satisfaction and loyalty
and
the importance of
ensuring customer
satisfaction in seemingly minor service
failures appears evident
(H. Jones & Farquhar, 2007). Customer satisfaction
is of
great importance for loyalty. The result shows that satisfaction
was
a significant antecedent
of
both behavioral and attitudinal loyalty (Matos et al., 2009). Rauyruen
and
Miller (2007) examine relationship quality influence attitudinal loyalty,
however, only satisfaction
and
perceived service quality influence behavioural loyalty (purchase intentions). Harris and
Goode (2004) surveyed customers in two distinct key online markets, that is: online purchasers of books and online buyers of flights. The result shows that
the
satisfaction
associations with loyalty from book.com were positively significant.
On the contrary, this result is not supported for flights.com.
Satisfying customer needs and wants
is
the key to gaining customer loyalty (Oliver, 1997). More
recent,
research shows that customer satisfaction has a direct and positive effect
in
customer loyalty in the
e-service
context
(Chen, 2012). Finally, Boakye et al. (2012)
suggest
that
a
customer’
s
satisfaction directly and positively
affect
his or her
attitudinal loyalty. This suggests that service satisfaction is important for customers. The positive relationship between satisfaction and attitudinal loyalty is consistent with previous research. Few studies
investigate about
the relationship between quality of alternatives, investment size and customer loyalty. Ping (1993) finds the
alternative
attractiveness
associations
with loyalty
were
not significant. In contrast, Boakye et al. (2012) show that attractiveness of alternatives has a negative but weak effect on a customer’
s
attitudinal loyalty towards casual dining restaurants. Investment size is the last factor in investment model. According to Ping (1993), the relationship between investment and loyalty was not significant. In contrast, Boakye et al. (2012) find that huge investment directly and positively affect
his or her
attitudinal loyalty. This suggests that investment size is important for customers. Therefore,
the hypotheses of the study area:
Hypothesis 1: Hypothesis 2: Hypothesis 3: Service satisfaction
is positively related
to customer
loyalty.
Quality of alternatives
is negatively related
to customer
loyalty.
Investment size
is positively related
to customer
loyalty. 4. CONCLUSION Based on the introduction and theoretical background, in order for the Indonesian banks to become more competitive and sustainable, customer loyalty plays a vital role. In this paper, a conceptual framework to study the relationship between the investment model and customer loyalty in the
banking industry in Indonesia
is proposed.
The
outcome
of this study
will contribute towards individuals, practitioners and academic involved in customer loyalty in the banking industry in Indonesia. REFERENCES Assael, H. (2001). Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action (Sixth ed.). Singapore: Thomson Learning. Beerli, A., Martín, J. D., & Quintana, A. (2004). A model of customer loyalty in the retail banking market. European Journal of Marketing, 38(1), 253-275. Bellizzi, J. A., & Bristol, T. (2004). An Assessment of Supermarket Loyalty Cards in One Major US Market. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(2), 144-154. Bloemer, J. M. M., & Kasper, H. D. P. (1995). The Complex Relationship between Consumer Satisfaction and Brand Loyalty. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16, 311-329. Bloemer, J., Ruyter, K. d., & Peeters, P. (1998). Investigating Drives of Bank Loyalty: The Complex Relationship Between Image, Service Quality and Satisfaction. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 16(7), 276-286. Boakye, K. G., Kwon, J., Blankson, C., & Prybutok, V. R. (2012). The Attraction of the Sizzle: A Service Investment Model. The Quality Management Journal, 19(4), 24-38. Boora, K. K., & Singh, H. (2011). Customer Loyalty and Its Antecedents: A Conceptual Framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Research in Business Management, 2(1), 151-164. Boulding, William, Kalra, Ajay, Staelin, R., & Zeithaml, V.A. (1993). A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectation to Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, XXX(February 1993), 7-27. Bügel, M. s., Buunk, A. P., & Verhoef, P. C. (2010). A Comparison of Customer Commitment in Five Sector Using the Psychological Investment Model. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 9, 2-29. Bank Indonesia. (2002). Statistik Ekonomi Keuangan Indonesia: Indonesian Financial Statistics. Vol. IV (02). Jakarta: Bank Indonesia. Bank Indonesia. (2012). Indonesia Banking Statistics - December 2012. Retrieved 22nd March, 2013, from http://m/bi.go.id/web/en/Statistik/Statistik+Perbankan/Statistik+Perbankan+Indonesia/spi_1012.htm. Chen, S.-C. (2012). The Customer Satisfaction-Loyalty Relation in an Interactive E-Service Setting: The Mediator. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Service, 19, 202-210. Day, G. S. (1969). A Two Dimensional Concept of Brand Loyalty. Journal of Advertising Research, 9(3), 29- 35. Dekimpe, M. G., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., Mellens, M., & Abeele, P. V. (1997). Decline and Variability in Brand Loyalty. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14, 405-420. Dick, A. S., & Basu, K. (1994). Customer Loyalty: Toward an Integrated Conceptual Framework. Journal of the Academi of Marketing Science, 22(2), 99-113. Farrell, D., & Rusbult, C. E. (1981). Exchange Variables as Predictors of Job Satisfaction, Job Commitment, and Turnover: The Impact of Rewards, Costs, Alternatives, and Investments. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28(1), 78-95. Gable, S., & Hunting, M. (2001). Child Care Providers' Organizational Commitment: A Test of the Investment Model. Child and Youth Care Forum, 30(5), 265-281. Ganesh, J., Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2000). Understanding the Customer Base of Service Providers: An Examination of the Differences Between Switchers and Stayers. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 65-87. Geyer, P. D., Dotson, M., & King, R. H. (1991). Atlantic Journal of Business. Predicting Brang Commitment: An Empirical Test of Rusbult's Investment Model, 27(2), 129-137. Griffin, J. (1995). Customer Loyalty. How to Earn It. How to Keep It. New York: Lexington Books. Griffin, J. (2002). Customer Loyalty: How to Earn It. How to Keep It. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass. A Wiley Imprint. Harris, L. C., & Goode, M. M. H. (2004). The Four Levels of Loyalty and the Pivotal Role of Trust: a Study of Online Service Dynamics. Journal of Retailing, 80, 139-158. Hatcher, L., Kryter, K., Prus, J. S., & Fitzgerald, V. (1992). Predicting College Student Satisfaction, Commitment, and Attrition from Investment Model Constructs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(16), 1273-1296. Hill, N., & Alexander, J. (2000). Handbook of Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty Measurement (Second ed.). Vermount: Gower Publishing Limited. Impett, E. A., Beals, K. P., & Peplau, L. A. (2001). Testing the Investment Model of Relationship Commitment and Stability in a Longitudinal Study of Married Couples. Cureent psychology: Development, Learning, Personality, Social, 20(4), 312-326. Jacoby, J., Chestnut, R. W., & Fisher, W. A. (1978). A Behavioral Process Approach to Information Acquisition in Nondurable Purchasing. Journal of Marketing Research, XV(November), 532-544. Johnson, M. D., & Gustafsson, A. (2000). Improving Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty and Profit. An Integrated Measurement and Management System. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Company. Jones, H., & Farquhar, J. D. (2007). Putting It Right: Service Failure and Customer Loyalty in UK Banks. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 25(3), 161-172. Jones, T., & Taylor, S. F. (2007). The conceptual domain of service loyalty: how many dimensions? Journal of Services Marketing, 21(1), 36-51. Koslowsky, M., & Kluger, A. (1986). Commitment to Participation in Musical Activities: An Extension and Application of the Investment Model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16(9), 831-844. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing Management (12 ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc. Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and Its Theorized Determinants: A Meta-Analysis of the Investment Model. Personal relationships, 10, 37-57. Lewis, B. R., & Soureli, M. (2006). The antecedents of consumer loyalty in retail banking. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5, 15-31. Matos, C. A. d., Henrique, J. L., & Rosa, F. d. (2009). The Different Roles of Switching Costs on the Satisfaction-Loyalty Relationship. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 27(7), 506-523. Methlie, L. B., & Nysveen, H. (1999). Loyalty of On-line Bank Customers. Journal of Information Technology, 14, 375-386. MITI. (2008). ASEAN Economic Community (AEC). Retrieved 22nd December, 2012, from http://www.miti.gov.my/cms/content.jsp?id=com.tms.cms.article.Article_b5e22087-c0a81573-aba0aba0- ab12873b. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38. Moutinho, L., & Smith, A. (2000). Modelling Bank Customer Satisfaction through Mediation of Attitudes towards Human and Automated Banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 18(3), 124-134. Murray, K. B. (1991). A Test of Services Marketing Theory: Consumer Information Acquisition Activities. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 10-25. Neal, C., Quester, P., & Hawkins, D. (1999). Consumer Behaviour: Implications for Marketing Strategy (Second ed.). Australia: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Nguyen, N., & LeBlanc, G. (1998). The Mediating Role of Corporate Image on Customers' Retention Decisions: An Investigation in Financial Services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 16(2), 52-65. O’Brien, L., & Jones, C. (1995). Do Rewards Really Create Loyalty? Harvard Business Review, 73(May-June), 75-82. Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction. A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc. Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence Customer Loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 63(Special Issue 1999), 33-44. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994). Reassessment of Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality: Implications for Further Research. Journal of Marketing, 58(Januari 1994), 111-124. Ping, R. A. (1993). The Effects of Satisfaction and Structural Constraints on Retailer Exiting, Voice, Loyalty, Opportunism and Neglect. Journal of Retailing, 69(3), 320-353. Ping, R. A. (2007). Salesperson-employer relationships: Salesperson responses to relationship problems and their antecedents. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 27(1), 39-57. PP No. 29/1999. Prasetyantoko, A. (2011). Saatnya Pembatasan Kepemilikan Asing di Perbankan. Retrieved 28 December, 2012, from http://www.indonesiafinancetoday.com/read/8482/Saatnya-Pembatasan-Kepemilikan-Asing- di-Perbankan. Rauyruen, P., & Miller, K. E. (2007). Relationship Quality as a Predictor of B2B Customer Loyalty. Journal of Business Research 60, 21-31. Reichheld, F. F. (1993). Loyalty-Based Management. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 64-73. Reichheld, F. F., & Sasser, W. E. (1990). Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services. Harvard Business Review, September-October, 105-112. Rosenberg, L. J., & Czepiel, J. A. (1983). A Marketing Approach for Customer Retention. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2, 45-51. Rusbult, C. E. (1980a). Commitment and Satisfaction in Romanctic Associations: A Test of the Investment Model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172-186. Rusbult, C. E. (1980b). Satisfaction and Commitment in Friendships. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 11(2), 96-105. Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A Longitudinal Test of the Investment Model: The Development (and Deterioration) of Satisfaction and Commitment in Heterosexual Involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Pychology, 45(1), 101-117. Rusbult, C. E., & Farrell, D. (1983). A Longitudinal Test of the Investment Model: The Impact on Job Satisfaction, Job Commitment, and Turnover of Variations in Reward, Costs, Alternative, and Investments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(3), 429-438. Rusbult, C. E., Johnson, D. J., & Morrow, G. D. (1986). Predicting Satisfaction and Commitment in Adult Romantic Involvements: An Assessment of the Generalizability of the Investment Model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49(1), 81-89. Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Mode Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal relationships, 5, 357-391. Rust, R. T., & Zahorik, A. J. (1993). Customer Satisfaction, Customer Retention, and Market Share. Journal of Retailing, 69(2), 193-215. Sheth, J. N., & Mittal, B. (2004). Customer Behavior: A Managerial Perspective. Ohio: Thomson, South- Western. Sung, Y., & Choi, S. M. (2010). "I Won't Leave You Although You Disappoint Me": The Interplay Between Satisfaction, Investment, and Alternatives in Determining Consumer-Brand Relationship Commitment. Psychology & Marketing, 27(11), 1050-1074. Syafrizal, Nabsiah, A. W., & Ismail, I. (2012). Retail Banking and Customer Relationship Quality Issues in Indonesia. Paper presented at the International Congress on Interdisciplinary Business and Social Science. The Central Bureau of Statistics. (1999). Statistical Year Book of Indonesia 1999. Jakarta: BPS - Statistics Indonesia. Uncles, M. D., Dowling, G. R., & Hammond, K. (2003). Customer Loyalty and Customer Loyalty Programs. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20(4), 294-316. Veloutsou, C., Daskou, S., & Daskou, A. (2004). Are the determinants of bank loyalty brand specific? Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 9(2), 113-126. Wiyanto. (2013). Didominasi Perbankan: YLKI Terima 620 Pengaduan Konsumen. Retrieved 22nd Feb, 2013, from http://ekonomi.inilah.com/read/detail/1950403/ylki-terima-620-pengaduan-konsumen#.UWo- rqNmOSo.
Proceedings of the
10th AAM
International Conference
2013
Proceedings of the
10th AAM
International Conference
2013
Proceedings of
the 10th AAM
International Conference
2013 Proceedings
of
the 10th AAM International Conference 2013
Proceedings of the
10th AAM
International Conference
2013
Proceedings of the
10th AAM
International Conference
2013
Proceedings of
the 10th AAM
International Conference
2013 Proceedings
of
the
10th AAM
International Conference
2013
Proceedings of the
10th AAM
International Conference
2013 Proceedings of the 10th AAM International Conference 2013 Proceedings of the 10th AAM International Conference 2013 Proceedings of the 10th AAM International Conference 2013 Proceedings of the 10th AAM International Conference 2013 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13